Hatzolah Ambulance

Post Reply
User avatar
rustynswrail
Posts: 646
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:18 pm
Location: Blue Mountains

Hatzolah Ambulance

Post by rustynswrail » Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:48 am

For those keeping track of these things, have logged the above on TG's

10381
10382
10383
10389

Enjoy!

R
Amateur Radio, when all other cures for insomnia fail!

User avatar
cartman
Posts: 2181
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: Liverpool, NSW, Australia

Re: Hatzolah Ambulance

Post by cartman » Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:00 pm

There is a couple of posts on it in the P25 talkgroups from a week ago
Looks like they have 10381-10390 judging on the hits i have seen

Grant
Professional Scanner nut. Ibis bin chicken of radio scraps
Scanners:
Uniden 325P2, Whistler TRX-1, GRE PSR800 x 2, Uniden 780 x 3, Uniden 796, Uniden 396 x 2, Uniden 246,
Software:
DSD v2.368, Unitrunker, Trunkview

User avatar
Bigfella237
Posts: 1897
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:11 pm
Location: In geosynchronous orbit above the Far South Coast of NSW, Australia

Re: Hatzolah Ambulance

Post by Bigfella237 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:49 pm

*If* they're still using the same basic setup as on the 4.1 system, then their channels should be something like:

10381 Hatzolah Net 1
10382 Hatzolah Net 2
10383 Hatzolah Net 3
10384 Hatzolah Net 4
10385 Hatzolah Net 5
10386 Hatzolah Net 6
10387 Hatzolah Net 7
10388 Hatzolah Net 8
10389 Hatzolah Net 9
10390 Hatzolah Net 10

I seem to recall many years ago someone caught a photo of one of their radios with the above tags?

Andrew

User avatar
rustynswrail
Posts: 646
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:18 pm
Location: Blue Mountains

Re: Hatzolah Ambulance

Post by rustynswrail » Thu Dec 09, 2010 4:58 am

Bigfella237 wrote:*If* they're still using the same basic setup as on the 4.1 system, then their channels should be something like:
10381 Hatzolah Net 1
10382 Hatzolah Net 2
10383 Hatzolah Net 3
10384 Hatzolah Net 4
10385 Hatzolah Net 5
10386 Hatzolah Net 6
10387 Hatzolah Net 7
10388 Hatzolah Net 8
10389 Hatzolah Net 9
10390 Hatzolah Net 10
I seem to recall many years ago someone caught a photo of one of their radios with the above tags? Andrew
Andrew,

From a conversation over heard, it appears to still be the case. My original post was to state that they were using the TG's I posted as opposed to just having them. I am wondering if the minimum number any group can have is 10, whether they need them or not?
Amateur Radio, when all other cures for insomnia fail!

User avatar
Bigfella237
Posts: 1897
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:11 pm
Location: In geosynchronous orbit above the Far South Coast of NSW, Australia

Re: Hatzolah Ambulance

Post by Bigfella237 » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:38 am

I don't know if there's a minimum but it'd be silly not to set up a few spare talkgroups initially, if I recall correctly the setup fee wasn't that much per talkgroup?

Andrew

centralcoastscanman
Posts: 750
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 7:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Hatzolah Ambulance

Post by centralcoastscanman » Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:57 am

You would be correct, when I met with the grn management at my work a while back I had a codeplug designed with about 10 spare talkgroups which they said straight up good work this would get approved immediately as it leaves room for expansion

User avatar
Bigfella237
Posts: 1897
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:11 pm
Location: In geosynchronous orbit above the Far South Coast of NSW, Australia

Re: Hatzolah Ambulance

Post by Bigfella237 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 3:04 am

I was wondering about some of these smaller agencies like Hatzolah, if they only have 10 talkgroups and they couldn't have more than a couple of hundred radios at the most (probably much less) so it seems a huge waste to allocate 10,000 radio IDs to them?

I guess my point is that I wouldn't be surprised to find another agency, perhaps ASNSW or one of the other small users sharing the 239xxxx RIDs?

Andrew

User avatar
rustynswrail
Posts: 646
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:18 pm
Location: Blue Mountains

Re: Hatzolah Ambulance

Post by rustynswrail » Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:55 am

Bigfella237 wrote:I was wondering about some of these smaller agencies like Hatzolah, if they only have 10 talkgroups and they couldn't have more than a couple of hundred radios at the most (probably much less) so it seems a huge waste to allocate 10,000 radio IDs to them?
I guess my point is that I wouldn't be surprised to find another agency, perhaps ASNSW or one of the other small users sharing the 239xxxx RIDs? Andrew
Andrew,

I would say you are correct, as we share 237's with someone else.


R
Amateur Radio, when all other cures for insomnia fail!

Post Reply