is that what it was, I heard it, thought it was for real, 2 buses had a head on somewhere out of Bathurst on highway ???, 27 injured, calling for other resources, hmmm starting to come together nowmatthewn1983 wrote:Nswas - 10303 being used for training this afternoon, car 801 and western ops for a 2 vehicle crash scenario.
P25 Talk Groups part 2
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 10:33 pm
- Location: Somewhere still not high enough in the Mid Blue Mts!
Re: P25 Talk Groups part 2
Re: P25 Talk Groups part 2
Looked at a Integral radio today and wrote down the channels on the GRN. These nearly match the current list we have here, but half seem to be one out with the group ids we have already.
D01 CNTRL E1
D02 CNTRL E2
D03 CNTRL W1
D04 CNTRL W2
D05 CNRTL S1
D06 CNRTL S2
D07 CNTRL N1
D08 CNTRL N2
D09 CNTRL C1
D10 CNTRL C2
D11 CNTRL C3
D12 CNTRL C4
D13 DESP 1
D14 DESP 2
D15 DESP 3
D16 TRANS 1
D17 TRANS 2
D18 TRANS 3
D19 CNTRLSP1
D20 CNTRLSP2
D21 KANDOS
D22 BYLNG
D23 LITHGOW
D24 KATOOMBA
D25 PENRITH 1
D26 PENRITH 2
D27 WINDSOR
D28 KINGS P1
D29 KINGS P2
D30 PARRA 1
D31 PARRA 2
D32 HOXTON 1
D33 HOXTON 2
D34 NARELL 1
D35 NARELL 2
D36 M VALE 1
D37 M VALE 2
D38 PICTON
D39 SPRNGW 1
D40 SPRNGW 2
D41 SHLHBR 1
D42 SHLHBR 2
D43 NOWRA 1
D44 NOWRA 2
D45 ULLAD
D46 COMMS 1
D47 COMMS 2
D48 SPARE
D49 SECUR 2
D50 BYLNG A
D52 SPARE
D53 SPARE
Cheers
Harry
D01 CNTRL E1
D02 CNTRL E2
D03 CNTRL W1
D04 CNTRL W2
D05 CNRTL S1
D06 CNRTL S2
D07 CNTRL N1
D08 CNTRL N2
D09 CNTRL C1
D10 CNTRL C2
D11 CNTRL C3
D12 CNTRL C4
D13 DESP 1
D14 DESP 2
D15 DESP 3
D16 TRANS 1
D17 TRANS 2
D18 TRANS 3
D19 CNTRLSP1
D20 CNTRLSP2
D21 KANDOS
D22 BYLNG
D23 LITHGOW
D24 KATOOMBA
D25 PENRITH 1
D26 PENRITH 2
D27 WINDSOR
D28 KINGS P1
D29 KINGS P2
D30 PARRA 1
D31 PARRA 2
D32 HOXTON 1
D33 HOXTON 2
D34 NARELL 1
D35 NARELL 2
D36 M VALE 1
D37 M VALE 2
D38 PICTON
D39 SPRNGW 1
D40 SPRNGW 2
D41 SHLHBR 1
D42 SHLHBR 2
D43 NOWRA 1
D44 NOWRA 2
D45 ULLAD
D46 COMMS 1
D47 COMMS 2
D48 SPARE
D49 SECUR 2
D50 BYLNG A
D52 SPARE
D53 SPARE
Cheers
Harry
-
- Posts: 1532
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:41 am
Re: P25 Talk Groups part 2
Wow, well done!
- Bigfella237
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:11 pm
- Location: In geosynchronous orbit above the Far South Coast of NSW, Australia
Re: P25 Talk Groups part 2
Thanks Harry, but as you said, something seems to be out by one?
I can 100% guarantee that TG 10644 is Ulladulla as it's my local talkgroup and I'm sure it has been referred to many times as "channel 44" (I think I may still have a recording of such from the big storms a while ago)?
Also, somebody here has already confirmed that channels 45 & 46 are the SCADA comms talkgroups?
Is there any chance that your list has an extra entry in there somewhere?
Andrew
EDIT: Just had a thought (and I'm only guessing here but)... all the above would line up if their talkgroup allocation started at 10600 instead of 10601?
Although this would be a bit unconventional as all other agency's allocations appear to start at xxxx1 (with the exception of RFS but I assume that's because they had to do a radio profile upgrade very early on in the peace)?
I can 100% guarantee that TG 10644 is Ulladulla as it's my local talkgroup and I'm sure it has been referred to many times as "channel 44" (I think I may still have a recording of such from the big storms a while ago)?
Also, somebody here has already confirmed that channels 45 & 46 are the SCADA comms talkgroups?
Is there any chance that your list has an extra entry in there somewhere?
Andrew
EDIT: Just had a thought (and I'm only guessing here but)... all the above would line up if their talkgroup allocation started at 10600 instead of 10601?
Although this would be a bit unconventional as all other agency's allocations appear to start at xxxx1 (with the exception of RFS but I assume that's because they had to do a radio profile upgrade very early on in the peace)?
Last edited by Bigfella237 on Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1532
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:41 am
Re: P25 Talk Groups part 2
10645 gets used alot by Techs at Castle Hill, havent seen 10646 at all.
Re: P25 Talk Groups part 2
I noticed that out by one too ... suspect that one of the D19 ... D22 maybe a standalone P25 frequency rather than a GRN channel
Grant
Grant
Professional Scanner nut. Ibis bin chicken of radio scraps
Scanners:
Uniden 325P2, Whistler TRX-1, GRE PSR800 x 2, Uniden 780 x 3, Uniden 796, Uniden 396 x 2, Uniden 246,
Software:
DSD v2.368, Unitrunker, Trunkview
Scanners:
Uniden 325P2, Whistler TRX-1, GRE PSR800 x 2, Uniden 780 x 3, Uniden 796, Uniden 396 x 2, Uniden 246,
Software:
DSD v2.368, Unitrunker, Trunkview
Re: P25 Talk Groups part 2
cartman wrote:I noticed that out by one too ... suspect that one of the D19 ... D22 maybe a standalone P25 frequency rather than a GRN channel
Grant
D22 BYLNG
__________________
Dopeler effect (n): The tendency of stupid ideas to seem smarter when they come at you rapidly.
Dopeler effect (n): The tendency of stupid ideas to seem smarter when they come at you rapidly.
- Bigfella237
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:11 pm
- Location: In geosynchronous orbit above the Far South Coast of NSW, Australia
Re: P25 Talk Groups part 2
Thanks Col,
So it's probably safe to assume that "D50 BYLNG A" would also be a conventional channel?
Any idea what the abbreviation represents?
Andrew
So it's probably safe to assume that "D50 BYLNG A" would also be a conventional channel?
Any idea what the abbreviation represents?
Andrew
Re: P25 Talk Groups part 2
Yeah its Bylong, NE of Mudgee.
Endevour have PMR allocations in that area, due to no GRN coverage in that area.
http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/site_ ... _ID=203857
hope this is of help
cheers
matt
Endevour have PMR allocations in that area, due to no GRN coverage in that area.
http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/site_ ... _ID=203857
hope this is of help
cheers
matt
VK2MRC
Re: P25 Talk Groups part 2
D22 BYLNG is actually D22 BYLNG D a slight correction, sorry guys and 50 BYLNG A are both scan channels. I had a look at the display again and noticed a scan symbol. I then checked to see what channels are scanned and it was
D22 BYLNG D and DIE_DIR1
D50 BYLNG A and DIE_DIR2
If we remove D22 this will then allow the talkgroup names to line up with what has been worked out already.
Thanks
Harry
D22 BYLNG D and DIE_DIR1
D50 BYLNG A and DIE_DIR2
If we remove D22 this will then allow the talkgroup names to line up with what has been worked out already.
Thanks
Harry