Search found 77 matches
- Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:40 pm
- Forum: Post Your Shack/Installation/Antennas
- Topic: Inside an RFS Cat. 1
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3782
Re: Inside an RFS Cat. 1
Anyway the O3 IMO is a nicer head. Till you break one... the Tait control mics are quite cheap but find out how much a replacement O3 mic is. I'd like to say more but I might ruffle a few feathers... These radios are designed & budgeted to last 10+ years so maybe people should look more at what wil...
- Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:36 pm
- Forum: Post Your Shack/Installation/Antennas
- Topic: Inside an RFS Cat. 1
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3782
Re: Inside an RFS Cat. 1
there is still a price for a W3 head on MOL. Yep your right, there is. However ring your sales rep and try to buy a complete radio not just a W3 head. Don't think you will get far. I'm buying around 2-3 a week at the moment and M don't want to ship us any W3's Unless it's just my lot.... which woul...
- Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:15 am
- Forum: Post Your Shack/Installation/Antennas
- Topic: Inside an RFS Cat. 1
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3782
Re: Inside an RFS Cat. 1
centralcoastscanman wrote:I hate the remote head option RFS have chosen for their XTL5000 radios, they should have used the W3 head like the SES and the Police have got..
Problem is the W3 is no longer, the O3 replaced it. So they don't get the option.
Col
- Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:31 pm
- Forum: Selling
- Topic: BNC Antenna - Suitable for Scanners
- Replies: 4
- Views: 848
Re: BNC Antenna - Suitable for Scanners
Any pics ?
Re: GNUradio
Matt,
you seem to have got my attention with this one, I like the look of it.
The Linux side of this hasn't scared me too much yet, what's a USRP worth ?
Col
you seem to have got my attention with this one, I like the look of it.
The Linux side of this hasn't scared me too much yet, what's a USRP worth ?
Col
Re: GNUradio
So I guess the question is how does it work ?
Is it worth the effort of installing on my Fedora box ?
Col
Is it worth the effort of installing on my Fedora box ?
Col
- Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:22 pm
- Forum: Fire & Rescue NSW
- Topic: New Temporary Station Closed Policy
- Replies: 6
- Views: 986
Re: New Temporary Station Closed Policy
Thanks Grant,
the reason I ask is I have seen a couple of times where a least one of these stations has turned a pump out with a crew of less than 4
I guess you can't pre plan everything....
Col
the reason I ask is I have seen a couple of times where a least one of these stations has turned a pump out with a crew of less than 4
I guess you can't pre plan everything....
Col
- Thu Oct 23, 2008 6:53 pm
- Forum: Fire & Rescue NSW
- Topic: New Temporary Station Closed Policy
- Replies: 6
- Views: 986
Re: New Temporary Station Closed Policy
Grant,
thanks for the info, however a quick question?
So as you have not listed then, could I assume the Blue Mountains stations 301, 445, 359, 495, 226, 386.
Are unaffected by this change ?
If this is the case what happens when these stations cannot field a crew of 4?
Col
thanks for the info, however a quick question?
So as you have not listed then, could I assume the Blue Mountains stations 301, 445, 359, 495, 226, 386.
Are unaffected by this change ?
If this is the case what happens when these stations cannot field a crew of 4?
Col
- Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:30 pm
- Forum: NSW Government Radio Network
- Topic: TG 54864 (RFS P25?)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 971
Re: TG 54864 (RFS P25?)
citabria wrote:oh ok, I wasnt aware the RFS was using the 5xxxx series P25 talkgroups.
Do you have a list of whats what?
Cheers,
Matt
Matt, sure do have a look at
http://www.scansydney.com/board/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=23
Col
- Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:19 am
- Forum: NSW Government Radio Network
- Topic: TG 54864 (RFS P25?)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 971
Re: TG 54864 (RFS P25?)
That talkgroup is RFS Ops comm 3
Col
Col