Page 1 of 1

World's First VHF TETRA Radio

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:58 pm
by cartman
https://www.damm-aus.com.au/2019/06/vhf ... tra-radio/

Probably more appealing to mining companies in Australia

Re: World's First VHF TETRA Radio

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2019 3:10 pm
by cartman
This appears to be the first VHF TETRA site in Australia
https://web.acma.gov.au/rrl/licence_sea ... 10697814/1

Re: World's First VHF TETRA Radio

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2019 8:10 am
by BrisbaneScan
will have to keep an eye out on the spectrum for that one. wasn't anything a few days ago

Re: World's First VHF TETRA Radio

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:04 pm
by Radio_Australia
Gmg are the radio retailers name , they sell them , it’s licensed to their shop address ,

And all their other allocations are encrypted tetra unfortunately

Re: World's First VHF TETRA Radio

Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 6:15 pm
by lolbananalol2
Radio_Australia wrote:Gmg are the radio retailers name , they sell them , it’s licensed to their shop address ,

And all their other allocations are encrypted tetra unfortunately
I wonder what they have to hide.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: World's First VHF TETRA Radio

Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:04 pm
by cartman
Given that VHF Telstra Fleetcoms MPT1327 is being shutdown across the nation within 12 months, is VHF Tetra an possible alternative to operate in this band or are there technical issues such as the 4.6Mhz input/output splits, transmitter power etc. I read that the UHF Tetra has limitations especially in the metropolitan areas

Grant

Re: World's First VHF TETRA Radio

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:53 pm
by rustynswrail
lolbananalol2 wrote:
Radio_Australia wrote:Gmg are the radio retailers name , they sell them , it’s licensed to their shop address ,
And all their other allocations are encrypted tetra unfortunately
I wonder what they have to hide.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I would suggest they probably have nothing to hide. They just may wish to keep their conversations private, something they are entitled to do. Given the onus is on the network owner to secure their communications, they have exercised that right.

One day, maybe scanner users will loose the attitude that because a frequency assignee secures their communications, it means they have something to hide, emergency services included. It is their decision and their prerogative to do so.

R