scanSydney

Apart from the fact that the transmission (by any means) of personal health records and information whereby - personal information is information or an opinion about an identified individual, or an individual who is reasonably identifiable. Information is identifiable if the relevant person can be ...

matthewn1983 wrote:
11676 (RID 2955xxx) Unknown
11678 (RID 2955xxx) Unknown

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

I've seen 11676 coming up and testing TDMA slots on 003-004 Mt Ainslie. Also RIDs in 1054nnn range. Perhaps a test talk group?

freqwaves wrote:Said it is a requirement when going on mining sites that you have UHFCB.

Yeah that's pretty much the standard on many construction sites too, along with a "quacker" (reverse beeper only 1000 times more annoying) and amber beacon(s). I think some sites still require a rotating type beacon as well.

Good one, thanks Matt.

There's been more new groups and RID prefixes affiliating recently, but no voice traffic yet. We'll have to wait and see.

Thanks, added.

why would Road maintenance and buses need to be encrypted? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Check the first post in this thread (updated), road maintenance TG isn't secure. As for buses, not only do Transport Canberra (ACTION) provide regular public transit and school services in the ACT, but SNT...

Thanks Grant, Matt.

I've updated this, and added a few new TGIDs and RIDs. More to come soon, hopefully.

Thanks guys, it's been good finding renewed interest.

Next little project might have to be to confirm some more info from the Light Rail DMR III system!

Update - Sites 003-051 and 003-052 have a NAC of 2D3. I have updated peer lists and site info too, will post shortly.

Hi all, here's a fairly accurate list of ACT talk groups I've compiled over the last 10 years or so. Until recently, I've been a bit absent from monitoring in that time so some things may have changed. But there are some TGs here I've either seen identified incorrectly, or not at all; enjoy. Please ...